• Case Studies
  • 2 Min Read

Faulty cruise control

The consumer’s issue:

“The front brake assist and cruise control systems on my car became faulty. I have therefore had to pay for the repairs because they were refused under my warranty agreement. To this end, I am seeking a refund for the repair and diagnostics.”

The accredited business’ response:

  • Having reviewed our records, the customer was charged 50% of the cost of the repairs.
  • The car was brought to one of our retailers with a front assist alignment issue, and because the cruise control system was not working correctly.
  • The retailer was unable to claim the cost of the repairs under warranty, as adjustments are only covered for the first six months or 6,500 miles, whichever comes sooner.
  • We are happy to cover the cost of the consumer’s next service as a goodwill gesture.

The adjudication outcome:

  • The Motor Ombudsman adjudicator found that the warranty literature did state that adjustments are only covered for a specific period.
  • The Motor Ombudsman ruled that the business was not liable to pay for the repair.
  • The adjudicator explained that unless the consumer could prove the adjustment was required as a result of a manufacturing defect (through an independent technical report), the case could not be upheld in their favour.

Conclusion:

  • The accredited business accepted the outcome as recommended by The Motor Ombudsman adjudicator and the case was closed. The customer has not appealed the outcome.
Related Posts
Expensive Car Supplement charge
  • Case Studies
  • 3 Min Read
Expensive Car Supplement charge
SUV vibration issues
  • Case Studies
  • 4 Min Read
SUV vibration issues
Hatchback paint chips
  • Case Studies
  • 3 Min Read
Hatchback paint chips