• Case Studies
  • 3 Min Read

Out-of-date sat nav system

The consumer’s issue:

“I bought a brand new car in March 2018. A few weeks later, when driving on a bypass between two motorway junctions, I saw that my satellite navigation system was showing that I was passing through fields. The road I was driving on was built in 2016, so clearly my system wasn’t up to date. I bought a brand new car, which means that the satellite navigation system should also be current. I am therefore looking for the manufacturer to either update it or send me a new SD card for it when it’s released.”

The accredited business’ response:

  • Satellite navigation system updates are done by a third party, so we have no control over their frequency, and a new update can sometimes take around four years to be introduced.
  • The consumer already has the latest version of the software, and as a vehicle manufacturer, there’s unfortunately nothing further that we can do to help them in this instance.

The adjudication outcome:

  • The Motor Ombudsman adjudicator didn’t uphold the consumer’s complaint because there was no manufacturing defect with the car.
  • The software was the most up-to-date version that could be provided when the consumer bought the car, and the vehicle manufacturer couldn’t control when it was updated, as this was the responsibility of a third party.
  • As such, there was no repair to be done under the vehicle warranty.
  • The consumer disagreed with this outcome, as they felt that what they were asking for was reasonable i.e. an updated SD card free of charge when it was released.
  • The complaint was referred to the ombudsman for a final decision.

The ombudsman’s final decision:

  • The ombudsman agreed with the adjudication outcome.
  • The only relationship between the consumer and the manufacturer is the warranty, and it is there to repair any manufacturing defects.
  • There was nothing broken on the consumer’s vehicle, and at this point in time, no further software updates could be provided.
  • The Motor Ombudsman also couldn’t look at the commercial relationship between the manufacturer and the third party, because ultimately, it’s the manufacturer’s choice as to who provides their services.
  • The ombudsman explained that the consumer could complain to their selling dealership, as they supplied the vehicle to the consumer and are responsible for its overall quality.
  • Against the manufacturer however, no award could be made to the customer.

Conclusion:

  • The accredited business was not found to be in breach of the Code of Practice for New Cars, and as such, the ombudsman didn’t make an award to the consumer.
Related Posts
Discoloured scuttle panel
  • Case Studies
  • 3 Min Read
Discoloured scuttle panel
Defective CV boot
  • Case Studies
  • 3 Min Read
Defective CV boot
Pickup purchase faults
  • Case Studies
  • 3 Min Read
Pickup purchase faults